Social Construction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Social Construction - Essay ExampleOn the other hand, contemporary mooring structuralist perspective even goes to the extent to deny the very possibility of such an agency or authorship as it was clearly asserted in the illustrious assertion by Rolland Barthes that The Author is Dead. Rather than posing the arguments on the agency of the social construction of reality by contesting schools against each other, the paper intends to examine the contend of each school based on its own internal validity. Here, it is important to note that social constructionism as an academic school is much diverse in itself. In other words, considering the internal stratifications within the social constructionist movement, it is particularly impossible to delineate a single essential position of social constructionism.Berger and Luckmann (1967) be of the view that soul of human beings is always intentional. They argue that it is nothing but intentionality makes the human consciousness so distinct. Therefore, in their analysis, a well-construed notion of intentionality remains central. Here, consciousness is not of necessity considered as being part of either an external physical cosmos or an inward subjective reality (Berger and Luckmann, 1967, p.26). Reality is diverse in itself. What is deemed as reality involves different spheres. The different spheres of reality are constituted by different objects. The existence of multiple realities is the defining characteristic of the conscious of the world. To exemplify, the reality of pack in dreams and the reality of people in the brokeries are equally realities. It is believed to be normal and self-evident. The reality of general life is the only reality that is of par excellence. The tensions at the level of consciousness are fully expressed only at this level of reality. The reality of everyday life is ordered in specific ways. The movement of ordering of a particular reality would determine its essence. Reality is nothing but objectification events in day to day life in a incorporate manner. In the social construction of reality, Berger and Luckmann (1967) see the important role of language as the supreme co-ordinates of life. Common sense too is a constituent factor of reality as based on it people generally interact with each other in everyday life situations. In other words, everyday life has normal and self-evident routines which are shared by people from the standpoint of commonsense knowledge. The reality of everyday life is not only constituted but also constructed by social interactions. Face-to-face is the most real form of the construct of social interactions. Ones subjectivity is particular to oneself. Social relations are highly flexible. The better knowledge of multiple social realities could be achieved through reflection. Therefore, Berger and Luckmann (1967) refer at the social construction of reality as a figure out through which individuals produce and reproduce the world through social interactions.The very existence of human beings, for Berger and Luckmann, is essentially linked to language. They forcefully argue that the social world and its complexities cannot be understood